皮敏消胶囊联合糠酸莫米松治疗寻常型银屑病的疗效观察

目的：观察皮敏消胶囊联合糠酸莫米松软膏治疗寻常型银屑病的临床疗效和安全性。方法123例寻常型银屑病患者分为治疗组、对照1组和对照2组各41例,治疗组患者口服皮敏消胶囊,每天3次,每次4片,外用糠酸莫米松软膏,每天2次,每次1遍,连续治疗8周;对照1组患者口服复方氨肽素片,每天3次,每次5片,外用糠酸莫米松软膏,每天2次,每次1遍,连续治疗8周;对照2组患者外用糠酸莫米松软膏,每天2次,每次1遍,连续治疗8周。结果治疗组患者治疗后有效率为80．49％;对照1组患者治疗后有效率为78．05％;对照2组患者治疗后总有效率为63．41％。治疗组、对照1组与对照2组疗效比较差异均有统计学意义（Z＝-2．359,P＝0．018;Z＝-2．102,P＝0．036）;治疗组与对照1组疗效比较差异无统计学意义（Z＝-0．271,P＝0．787）。三组患者均无明显不良反应。结论皮敏消胶囊联合糠酸莫米松软膏治疗寻常型银屑病是安全的、有效的。     

糠酸莫米松联合抗组胺药物对非变应性鼻炎的疗效观察

目的分析糠酸莫米松联合抗组胺药物治疗NAR的疗效。方法选择本院收治的NAR患者34例,应用糠酸莫米松联合抗组胺药物治疗。分别对患者治疗前、治疗后1个月、治疗后3个月的临床症状进行评估。结果患者治疗前主要症状的评分为(2.71±0.53)分,治疗后1个月为(1.81±0.53)分,治疗后3个月为(0.89±0.43)分;对患者治疗前后分类症状语言评价量表评分比较,9个症状评分均呈下降趋势,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在治疗过程中头痛发生率为3.0%(1/33),鼻腔干燥发生率为3.0%(1/33)。结论糠酸莫米松联合抗组胺药物可以有效改善NAR患者的临床症状。     

钙泊三醇倍他米松乳膏联合窄谱中波紫外线治疗稳定期寻常型银屑病的疗效分析

目的:观察钙泊三醇倍他米松软膏、卡泊三醇软膏和糠酸莫米松乳膏分别与窄谱中波紫外线(NB-UVB)照射联合治疗寻常型银屑病的效果与不良反应。方法:将90例稳定期寻常型银屑病患者随机分为3组,每组30例。治疗组予钙泊三醇倍他米松软膏,对照组A予卡泊三醇软膏,对照组B予糠酸莫米松乳膏。3组均将药物涂擦于皮肤损伤部位,每日1次;均在治疗过程中接受NB-UVB照射,3次/周;3组患者的疗程均为4周。治疗过程中每周观察1次疗效。结果:治疗2周时,治疗组的有效率(36.67%)高于对照组A(13.33%)和对照组B(13.33%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗4周时,治疗组有效率(93.33%)高于对照组A(73.33%)与对照组B(66.67%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。钙泊三醇倍他米松的主要不良反应为灼热和红斑,但患者可耐受。结论:钙泊三醇倍他米松软膏、卡泊三醇软膏和糠酸莫米松乳膏与NB-UVB联合应用治疗寻常型银屑病均安全有效,其中以钙泊三醇倍他米松软膏的起效最快、疗效最好、不良反应最少。     

Dose-ranging study of fluticasone furoate nasal spray for Japanese patients with perennial allergic rhinitis

ABSTRACT

Background: This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS), a novel enhanced-affinity intranasal corticosteroid, in Japanese patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR), and to determine the optimal dose.

Methods: In this phase II, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging study, 240 patients (aged ≥ 16 years) received once-daily (od) treatment for 2 weeks with either FFNS 110 μg (n = 80), 220 μg (n = 81) or placebo (n = 79). Patients evaluated 3 nasal symptoms using a 4-point scale. Efficacy was assessed as the mean change from baseline in total nasal symptom score (TNSS).

Results: Treatment with FFNS resulted in a significantly greater decrease over the treatment period in the mean 3TNSS (sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion; p < 0.001 each dose vs. placebo), compared with placebo. More patients receiving FFNS had a markedly or moderately improved impression of treatment than placebo recipients (48% and 49% for FFNS 110 μg and 220 μg, respectively, vs. 18% for placebo; p < 0.001). Nasal rhinoscopy findings revealed significant improvements in mucosal swelling of the inferior turbinate (110 μg: p = 0.004; 220 μg: p = 0.011) and amount of watery rhinorrhea (110 μg: p = 0.003; 220 μg: p < 0.001), compared with placebo. Both doses of FFNS were well tolerated.

Conclusions: Both FFNS 110 µg and 220 µg od were effective in alleviating nasal symptoms in Japanese patients with PAR over the 2-week duration of this study. FFNS 110 µg od was selected as the optimal dose for further evaluation in phase III clinical trials.     

Topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment (protopic) reverses nickel contact dermatitis elicited by allergen challenge to a similar degree to mometasone furoate 0.1% with greater suppression of late erythema

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of topical tacrolimus 0.1% under occlusion for 48 h to suppress nickel-elicited allergic contact dermatitis in a randomized, petrolatum- and mometasone furoate 0.1% ointment-controlled double-blind, intra-individual study which included 28 women volunteers. 3 closed patch tests (Finn Chambers on Scanpor, Epitest Ltd Oy, Tuusula, Finland) containing 0.1 ml of 5% nickel sulfate in petrolatum were applied on day 0. After removal on day 2, the study compounds were applied under occlusion for 48 h. The eczema reaction and the degree of erythema were evaluated clinically and by reflectance spectrophotometry at days 4 and 7, respectively. Mean visual scores corresponding to petrolatum-treated sites were significantly higher than those corresponding to both mometasone furoate and tacrolimus at days 4 (P < 0.001) and 7 (P < 0.001). In both tacrolimus- and mometasone furoate-treated sites, there was a significant decrease in visual scores with time (P < 0.001) from day 2 to day 7, and the corresponding mean decreases in scores were 0.73 and 1.04, respectively. The difference between both was 0.30 in favour of tacrolimus (95% confidence intervals, -0.04 and 0.65), although this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.084). Mean erythema index values were similar at day 2. Significant differences among treatment sites were seen at days 4 (P < 0.001) and 7 (P < 0.001). The decrease was significantly more pronounced on day 7 in patches where tacrolimus had been supplied (P < 0.5). This method might provide useful means to compare different concentrations and/or presentations of tacrolimus or other calcineurin inhibitors and topical anti-inflammatory agents.     

Onset of action of mometasone furoate nasal spray (NASONEX) in seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS, NASONEX ), is a new synthetic corticosteroid with considerable efficacy in the treatment of seasonal and perennial rhinitis and less than 0.1% systemic absorption. This study was designed to evaluate the time of onset of action of MFNS. The subjects were evaluated over the course of 2 weeks during the spring allergy season. METHODS: The effects of MFNS 200 microg given once daily for 2 weeks were evaluated in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 201 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Clinically significant onset of action was assessed prospectively by special patient diary cards kept during the first 3 days of treatment. RESULTS: By 12 h after initial dosage (the earliest evaluation), 28% of patients in the MFNS group experienced clinically significant relief, compared with 13% of those given placebo (P = 0.01). Median time to at least moderate symptom relief in patients who received MFNS was 35.9 h, compared with more than 72 h in patients given placebo (P<0.01). By 72 h, 64% of the patients receiving MFNS experienced at least moderate relief, compared with 40% of those treated with placebo (P<0.01). Both patient and physician ratings of symptom severity, response to treatment, and overall condition of rhinitis indicated significant (P<0.01) superiority of MFNS over placebo. MFNS was well tolerated, with adverse events comparable to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: MFNS provided rapid onset of clinically significant symptom relief in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.     

糠酸莫米松乳膏联合维A酸乳膏治疗黄褐斑的效果及安全性

分析对黄褐斑患者采用糠酸莫米松乳膏联合维A酸乳膏治疗的效果及安全性。方法 选择空军 军医大学第二附属医院2022年1月-12月收治的70例黄褐斑患者为研究对象,随机分为对照组和观察组,每 组35例。对照组予以维A酸乳膏治疗,观察组予以糠酸莫米松乳膏联合维A酸乳膏治疗,比较两组症状积 分、临床疗效、生活质量及不良反应发生情况。结果 观察组治疗后症状积分低于对照组（P ＜0.05）;观 察组治疗总有效率为94.29%,高于对照组的74.29%（P ＜0.05）;观察组治疗后生活质量各项评分均高于 对照组（P ＜0.05）;两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义（P ＞0.05）。结论 维A酸乳膏联合糠 酸莫米松乳膏治疗黄褐斑的效果良好,可改善患者的临床症状,有利于提升其生活质量,同时联合应用的 安全性较高,不会增加不良反应发生风险。     

Effects of monotherapy with intra-nasal corticosteroid or combined oral histamine and leukotriene receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: The combination of a leukotriene receptor antagonist with an antihistamine may have beneficial effects in seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). OBJECTIVE: To determine how combined oral mediator blockade compares to monotherapy with intranasal corticosteroid in the treatment of SAR. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis were enrolled in a placebo controlled crossover study comparing 2 weeks therapy of either (a) 200 microg intranasal mometasone furoate (MF) once daily or (b) 10 mg oral montelukast plus 10 mg oral cetirizine once daily (MON/CZ), with a 7-10 day placebo period prior to each treatment period. Domiciliary measures of symptoms and nasal flow were recorded daily. Measurements of posterior rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry and nasal nitric oxide were made after all treatment and placebo periods. RESULTS: There were significant (P < 0.05) improvements in domiciliary peak nasal flow (l/min) with both MF (133 (3.8)) and MON/CZ (124 (3.8)) compared to pooled placebo (110 (4.0). Both treatments also showed significant improvement in terms of nasal blockage (units) (PL: 1.1(0.1), MF: 0.5 (0.1), MON/CZ 0.7 (0.1); and total nasal symptoms (units) (PL: 3.5 (0.3), MF 1.6 (0.3), MON/CZ 1.7 (0.3)), although there was no significant difference between the two active treatments. There were no significant differences between placebo and treatment for rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry or nitric oxide. CONCLUSIONS: Both intranasal mometasone furoate as monotherapy and oral cetirizine plus montelukast as cotherapy were equally effective for objective and subjective measures of treatment response in SAR. Domiciliary measurements of symptoms and peak flow were more sensitive than laboratory measurements of rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry and nasal nitric oxide.     

Treating acute rhinosinusitis: comparing efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray, amoxicillin, and placebo

BACKGROUND: Intranasal corticosteroids used with antibiotics are known to improve rhinosinusitis symptoms compared with antibiotic therapy alone. However, the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid monotherapy for acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis is not established. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) versus amoxicillin and placebo in patients with acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis. METHODS: In this double-blind, double-dummy trial, subjects (> or =12 years; N = 981) were randomized to MFNS 200 microg once daily or twice daily for 15 days, amoxicillin 500 mg 3 times daily for 10 days, or respective placebo. Follow-up was 14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean am/pm major symptom score over the treatment phase. Secondary efficacy endpoints included total symptom score. Safety assessments included disease recurrence during follow-up and adverse event monitoring. RESULTS: Mometasone furoate nasal spray 200 microg twice daily was significantly superior to placebo (P < .001) and amoxicillin (P = .002) at improving major symptom score. Starting on day 2, MFNS 200 microg twice daily improved total symptom score throughout treatment versus amoxicillin (P = .012) and placebo (P < .001). Global response to treatment was significantly greater with MFNS 200 microg twice daily versus amoxicillin (P = .013) and placebo (P = .001). Although significantly superior to placebo, MFNS 200 microg once daily was not superior to amoxicillin for the primary or secondary efficacy endpoints. All treatments were well tolerated with a similar incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis, MFNS 200 microg twice daily produced significant symptom improvements versus amoxicillin and placebo, without predisposing the patient to disease recurrence or bacterial infection.     

The role of patient training in the management of seasonal rhinitis and asthma: clinical implications

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is an inflammatory disease often associated with bronchial asthma. Intranasal corticosteroids and oral antihistamines are the first-choice drugs. Patient training is relevant to asthma management, but little is known about its impact on rhinitis. We evaluated the role of patient training in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and its effects on nasal and bronchial symptoms. METHODS: One hundred and one patients (M/F = 62/39, age range 12-62 years) with pollen-induced rhinitis (32 with concomitant mild asthma) were enrolled. They were randomized into three groups: A (n = 30) with drug therapy alone, B (n = 35) with drug therapy plus training on the use of nasal spray, and C (n = 36) the same as B plus a lesson on rhinitis and asthma. All patients received mometasone furoate nasal spray for 8 weeks as regular therapy, plus rescue medications on demand. Symptoms and drug consumption were evaluated during the pollen season. RESULTS: The rate of noncompliance/dropout was highest in the untrained patients (P = 0.001). No difference in nasal symptoms was seen among the three groups. On the other hand, group C had significantly fewer asthma symptoms (P = 0.02) and less albuterol use (P = 0.005) than group A. Moreover, the trained group globally used less rescue medication than the other groups (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Detailed training of patients seems to improve compliance with treatment, reduce concomitant asthma symptoms, and reduce the use of symptomatic drugs.